Eating Green: How Changing Your Diet Can Help the Environment

Posted on by Sharon Bennett

Did you know that the food choices we make have a direct impact on the environment? It’s true! The way we eat can help protect our planet, or it can contribute to its destruction. In this blog post, we will explore how our diet can help the environment. We’ll discuss some of the benefits of eating green, and we’ll provide tips for making more sustainable food choices. So read on to learn more about how you can make a difference with your diet!

The first way that our diet can help the environment is by reducing food waste. Every year, billions of pounds of food are wasted in the United States alone. This wasted food takes up valuable space in landfill sites, and it emits greenhouse gases as it decomposes. When we reduce our food waste, we can help to alleviate these problems. There are a few simple ways to reduce food waste in your home. First, make sure to only buy the amount of food that you will actually consume. Second, try to use up all of the food that you purchase before it goes bad. And third, compost any food scraps that you can’t eat. By following these simple tips, you can make a big difference in the amount of food waste that ends up in landfills.

Another way that our diet can help the environment is by choosing more sustainable foods. When we choose sustainable foods, we are choosing products that have been grown or raised in an environmentally-friendly manner. This means selecting foods that have been produced without harming the environment. Some examples of sustainable foods include organic fruits and vegetables, free-range eggs, and grass-fed beef. By choosing these items, we can help to support farmers who are using sustainable practices. And when we support sustainable agriculture, we are helping to protect our planet for future generations.

So there you have it! These are just a few of the ways that our diet can help the environment. By making more sustainable food choices, we can make a big difference in the health of our planet. So next time you’re at the grocery store, keep these tips in mind. And remember, every little bit counts!

Do you have any tips for eating green? We’d love to hear them! Share your thoughts in the comments section below. Thanks for reading!

Learning How to Compromise Political Differences

Posted on by Sharon Bennett

Learning how to compromise political differences is vital if you hope to have a successful and prosperous country. Compromising is essential in politics, business, sports, and in everyday life. However, it is often the case that political leaders find themselves at an impasse when trying to work out compromises with those they differ politically with. In cases where a leader and opposition leader cannot seem to cooperate, it is often the case that action will need to be taken to remove the person who is not cooperative. If your country is willing to learn how to compromise political differences then you might find the following tips helpful.

The first tip for how to compromise political differences is to realize that compromising isn’t always easy. Sometimes it takes more than one person to agree on a course of action. In fact, if many people are not on the same page, it may be more effective to hold off on making any kind of compromise until a point when enough people are in agreement that some type of compromise is the best option. If you try to get the same amount of compromise done as there are individuals with whom you disagree then it is more likely that this will not be a successful strategy for you.

When trying to learn how to compromise political differences, you also need to recognize that the different political views of others are legitimate points of contention. While it may seem easier to ignore political disagreements other than doing nothing about them, the fact is that ignoring political issues can lead to even greater political problems. For instance, by not making any kind of compromise during political contests it is possible that certain groups or individuals can take advantage of the situation and gain an unfair advantage. There are many different groups that may find a political disagreement to their advantage, and having no compromise is definitely not a good idea. The best way to make sure that you do not allow any group or individual to use political disagreements as an opportunity for gaining an unfair advantage is to simply agree with their political views and stand firm against any unfair advantage they may claim.

The problem comes when you know that the political arguments you are involved in are ones that are divisive. Asking someone to compromise their own positions can often prove to be extremely difficult. On the other hand, agreeing to compromises made by others without asking for anything in return can lead to very smooth political negotiations. Learning how to compromise political differences is only part of the process; you also need to understand that there are some things that should never be included in compromise deals. Things like race or religion should not be part of any deal because they will inevitably bring division and conflict to the table instead of compromise.

Unfortunately, there are plenty of situations where learning how to compromise political differences will be crucial. The first situation that proves to be this problematic is when one party is clearly going to gain an advantage through a compromise. In these cases, asking how to compromise political differences becomes even more important. If there are a number of different points of view that could be used to prove that one side is clearly right and the other is wrong, then asking how to find the middle ground may prove impossible. In these situations, compromise deals are usually the best solution.

Learning how to compromise political differences is something that should be done during regular negotiation sessions. By learning how to reach agreement on a number of different issues, you can make it much easier to come to peace. Unfortunately, if there is bad blood between both sides of a political debate, then finding the middle ground will be harder than usual. This means that asking how to compromise political differences often turns into a difficult task. The best way to avoid these problems is to put politics aside and focus on getting the job done.Learning How to Compromise Political Differences

Did Hillary Clinton Really Voice Support for Donald Trump in 2013?

Posted on by Sharon Bennett

Many unanswered questions remain about the 2016 U.S. President Election in which Donald Trump upset Hillary Clinton. The election was controversial and divisive on social media, where true and false political gossip was widely spread. 

One of the countless election memes that were circulated online gave the impression that three years earlier Hillary Clinton made a statement to bankers the nation needed a business leader such as Trump as president.

What Did Hillary Supposedly Say About Trump?

In October 2016 an infographic spread on social media that Hillary Clinton said the following in 2013: “I would like to see people like Donald Trump run for office; they’re honest and can’t be bought.” Accompanying the quote was a photo of Donald standing next to Hillary, which was taken at the future president’s wedding to Melania in 2005.

Trump and Clinton Relationship

It should come as no surprise that either the Trump or Clinton families would say something nice about the other, as the two families became friends during Bill Clinton’s White House years. Trump praised and defended President Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. He also had positive things to say about Hillary in interviews when she ran for president the first time in 2008.

Even after the extremely negative 2016 campaign from both parties, Trump still spoke highly of the Clintons when they attended his inaugural luncheon in 2017, saying he had great respect for them. Ivanka Trump and Chelsea Clinton particularly have had a close friendship over the years. Photos also show Donald Trump at a golf course with Bill Clinton. 

So it’s not hard to believe that it would be very possible for Hillary to praise family friend Donald Trump three years before anyone knew what to expect about Obama’s successor. 

What Fact-Checkers Say

The meme was debunked by fact-check sites and several major news sources that identified the origin of the fake quote as a discontinued Israel-based website. The website’s “About Us” page clarified the site mixed news with satire. Interestingly, several other satire sites were taken as fact during the election, leading to what could be argued as the biggest spread of political misinformation in the history of propaganda.

Both Factcheck.org and Politifact rate the quote as false – meaning it wasn’t a real quote by Hillary, as it apparently was meant as satirical humor. It’s no more true than saying Donald Trump made Mike Pence wear a training collar throughout his Presidency.

The closest thing Hillary said to the fake quote during her actual speech was “You know, I would like to see more successful business people run for office.” She went on to say “you don’t have to have 30 billion, but you have a certain level of freedom.” She never mentioned Trump at all in the entire speech.

The website claimed Hillary made a positive comment about Trump on October 29, 2013, at Goldman Sachs. Even though she actually did speak to the investment firm on that date, the transcript revealed the quote in question was nowhere to be found. The transcript of that speech was posted online by WikiLeaks.

Conclusion

As much as some people want to believe Hillary promoted Donald Trump for President in a 2013 speech, the quote was fabricated by a hybrid news/satire website. It’s one of many examples of how satire or another form of entertainment can be confused as truth for some people.

Celebrities That Voiced Their Dissent Towards Donald Trump’s Presidency

Posted on by Sharon Bennett

From the moment he came down the escalator to announce his candidacy for the US presidency, Donald Trump became the object of much criticism among celebrities from around the world. Here are a few topics celebrities commented on and what a few of them said.

Coronavirus

Actress Debra Messing criticized Trump and his followers for Trump’s attitude toward the virus on Twitter, saying many would die, including Maga loyalists.

Actor, writer, and director Rob Reiner tweeted that Trump needed to be stopped from speaking publicly about the virus, then removed from office.

In a tweet, Trevor Noah said Trump “bumbled” his way through handling the virus.

Captain America star Chris Evans criticized Trump via tweet for not taking questions after a speaking event, asking for answers about Coronavirus from Trump and not VP Pence.

Mega-star entertainer Bette Midler criticized Trumps’ handling of information, suggesting he should not be believed about his test was negative because he lies about everything, according to her tweet.

Writer and comic Larry David said watching Trump speak daily on the virus turned him into a maniac who yells at the tv because of what Trump says.

Actor Don Cheadle criticized Trump’s “Chinese virus” label, suggesting Trump was trying to deflect attention from his response onto China.

Russia Collusion

During and after the Trump-Putin summit that took place after the Russian collusion story took hold, many celebrities had much to say. The criticism mostly centered on Trump’s open questioning of American intelligence concerning Russian interference in the election.

Actor/director Zack Braff tweeted “treason is trending” during the summit.

Actor Jeffrey Wright suggested the summit was a show, sarcastically asking Kim Jong-Un to join the charade.

Rob Reiner criticized Trump for meeting with Putin but refusing to meet with Robert Mueller, who was investigating the President’s alleged connection to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Comedienne Chelsea Handler made homosexual/homophobic insinuations about the men’s relationship during the summit.

Bette Midler called Trump a traitor for not addressing Russian interference in the election with Putin. Actress Rosanna Arquette echoed that sentiment.

Actor Chris Meloni outrightly called Trump an agent of Putin.

Famed actress Mia Farrow stated that Trump’s “first allegiance is to Russia.”

Iconic actor Carl Reiner accused Trump of treason for “denigrating our… FBI… and praising Putin.”

Figure skater Adam Rippon called Trump “Putin’s puppet.”

Some politicians opined as well.

Senator Elizabeth Warren said by embracing Putin and questioning the FBI’s intelligence gathering, Trump “betrayed America’s institutions… and attacked our democracy.”

Senator Jeff Flake remarked on Trump standing with the Russian dictator while blaming the US for Russian aggression.

Representative Nancy Pelosi said Russia must have had blackmail material to make Trump behave the way he did.

A few celebrity television news channel personalities added their influential voices to the chorus.

MSNBC anchor Joy Reid remarked on Trump’s refusal to address Putin directly about Russia’s interference only to shift attention to Hillary Clinton.

CNN’s Lawrence O’Donnell noted Trump’s lack of anti-Putin bravery.

Repeat Offended

A few celebrities had long-standing feuds with President Trump across many issues along the timeline.

Model Chrissy Teigen took umbrage at President Trump’s description of her as John Legend’s “filthy-mouthed wife,” using profanity to describe the fact that Trump didn’t tag her on his Twitter attack.

The feud between Donald Trump and comic turned daytime talk show host-turned co-host of ABC’s The View Rosie O’Donnell goes back years to O’Donnell’s characterization of Trump as a snake-oil salesman and flared up as soon as Trump announced his candidacy. Commenting on it more than once, O’Donnell still holds that it is Trump who will not let the feud end.

Second, only to O’Donnell is Robert DeNiro. DeNiro began by insulting Trump personally as a candidate then moved into attacking his policies, even stating his belief that Trump would engineer a third term for himself

Analysis: Tim Kaine’s Prediction of The Catholic Church’s Stance on Same-Sex Marriage

Posted on by Sharon Bennett

The Analysis of Tim Kaine and His Stance on Same-Sex Marriage

Former Virginia Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine appeared to change his views regarding same-sex marriage in 2016, a stance which he adamantly opposed in 2005. Best known for his campaign with the presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, Kaine famously spoke out about his predictions for same-sex marriage in the future to media outlets such as The New York Times and CNN. 

What Was Tim Kaine’s Original Argument?

Kaine has always been an outspoken Roman Catholic with religious opinions that same-sex marriage should not be recognized. This stance comes from traditional Catholic teachings and Bible verses against homosexuality. In his famous statement, Kaine described interviewing Virginia residents who said they hoped LGBT individuals would move out of their area if they weren’t allowed to marry. 

Why Did Tim Kaine Change His Mind?

Kaine spoke out at the Human Rights Campaign yearly dinner in September of 2016 with his new opinions on the issue. Quoting Pope Francis about judgment and referencing the Genesis chapter in the Bible, Kaine said that diversity should be celebrated in the world. This includes members of the LGBT community who were allowed to marry by legislation in 2015. Stemming from the statement of Virginia voters who would not welcome same-sex marriage, Kaine allegedly made his decision to accept it. 

What Were Tim Kaine’s Predictions For The Future of the Catholic Church?

Kaine expressed in his statement that he believes the Catholic church will follow suit with his opinions and welcome same-sex marriage the way they accept the marriage between a man and a woman. In his speech, Kaine expressed hope for the Catholic church to change its views on same-sex marriage as a former missionary himself. However, he was met with opposition from Richmond, VA Bishop Francis X. DiLorenzo who spoke out and said he did not believe that the church would change their 2,000-year-old doctrine about same-sex marriage. 

What Was The Controversy of Tim Kaine?

Tim Kaine was and is vocal about his commitment to the Catholic church; however, his progressive-leaning towards politics has raised a few eyebrows. Kaine has spoken out as opposed to abortion personally while still respecting the laws that allow women to choose. His involvement with progressive Democrat Hillary Clinton also was in question as to her running mate and more left-leaning views than the church are known for. 

What Happened With Tim Kaine’s Prediction?

Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine lost the presidential race in 2016 to Donald Trump and Michael Pence. This decision from the Electoral College caused controversy due to Trump’s media reputation and Pence’s vocal stance against members of the LGBTQ community. 

Two years later in 2018, Kaine signed a letter with 20 other senators to Mike Pompeo, Secretary of State, to reverse a ruling of disallowing visas to diplomats in same-sex marriages. He also joined signing with senators in the following year of 2019 to address Pompeo with his refusal to commemorate June as Pride Month as had been a White House tradition. 

Tim Kaine remains a member of the United States Senate in Virginia as of 2021. While the controversies surrounding the election of 2016 and each party’s opposing opinions, the senator continues working with diverse sectors such as committees for foreign labor and the Armed Services.

A Look-Back on Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Relationship with Donald Trump During His Presidency

Posted on by Sharon Bennett

The second female Supreme Court justice and 45th President of the United States have never minced words about each other.

Election Season 2016

Ruth Bader Ginsberg was nominated to the highest court in the nation by then-President Bill Clinton in 1993. Donald Trump was a reality TV show star and real estate figure, with a worldwide string of hotels.

During the election season, when Ginsberg was asked about then-candidate Trump, she responded: “I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president … For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” [The New York Times, “Ruth Bader Ginsburg, no fan of Donald Trump, critiques latest term,” July 10, 2016.] A few days later she doubled down on her comments and went even further, calling him a ‘faker’, expressing disbelief that he had not released his tax returns, and saying “he really has an ego.” [CNN]

Candidate Trump then commented on her comments in a New York Times interview, saying, “I think it’s highly inappropriate that a United States Supreme Court judge gets involved in a political campaign, frankly … I think it’s a disgrace to the court and I think she should apologize to the court. I couldn’t believe it when I saw it… That she should be saying that? It’s so beneath the court for her to be making statements like that. It only energizes my base even more. And I would hope that she would get off the court as soon as possible.” He then followed up his comments with a tweet calling on her to resign.

On her part, Ginsberg then released a statement expressing regret and acknowledging the importance of apolitical behavior for justices, and said, “In the future, I will be more circumspect.”

Indeed, it is historically unusual for a Supreme Court justice to give a personal opinion on any political candidate or process.

The Trump Presidency and Replacement Debate

President Trump took office in January of 2017, at which time Justice Ginsberg had been serving for 23 years. After the election, things between the President and the Justice were relatively quiet. Ginsberg had several trips to the hospital and her health began declining, spurring a debate about the Constitutionality of when and with whom to replace her, were she to pass away before the end of President Trump’s term.

When Justice Ginsberg did pass in September of 2020, it was reportedly her dying wish that her replacement not come until the new president had been sworn in. Many opinions on both sides of the aisle were expressed by a myriad of public figures and politicians, and 200-year-old letters by Presidents were unearthed and interpreted. When the time came for the sitting President to make a decision, he chose to disregard both that historical analysis and the justice’s last words, and expressed doubt in the veracity of Ginsberg’s reported dying wish. After releasing a statement heralding Ginsberg as a ‘titan of the law’ who ‘led an amazing life, he then gave an interview in which he made clear his intention to replace her, stating that he believed that the report that Ginsberg did not wish to be replaced until the next Presidential term (remember, at this point, the election had not been held, so the next President was not yet decided) was a fabrication authored by Democratic leaders in the House and Senate.

President Trump went on to nominate Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame law professor, who was confirmed by a purely partisan vote.